Tetracyclines: Insights and Updates of their Use in Human and Animal Pathology and their Potential Toxicity

Alessandro di Cerbo1, 2, *, Federica Pezzuto3, Gianandrea Guidetti4, Sergio Canello5, Lorenzo Corsi2
1 Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Dental School, University "G. d`Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
3 University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
4 SANYpet S.p.a., Department of Research and Development, Bagnoli di Sopra (Padua), Italy
5 Forza10 USA Corp., Department of Research and Development, Orlando (FL), USA

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 66
Abstract HTML Views: 58
PDF Downloads: 20
ePub Downloads: 19
Total Views/Downloads: 163
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 49
Abstract HTML Views: 34
PDF Downloads: 18
ePub Downloads: 16
Total Views/Downloads: 117

© 2019 di Cerbo et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Dental School, University G. d`Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; E-mail:


Tetracycline antibiotics (TCs) have been widely employed to treat bacterial infections and other pathologic conditions in humans and pets. Although most of TCs have been almost ruled out from the human clinical practice they are still used as growth promoters and to treat promiscuity and overcrowding pathologies in the intensive animal farming. As a consequence, TCs are commonly found in all ecological compartments with potential direct or indirect toxicological effects on animals and, generally, on all living organisms. Moreover, clinical and in vitro observations raised the hypothesis that the widespread of some adverse food reactions and, to a less extent, antibiotic resistance phenomena could be ascribed to the presence of TCs residues in edible and non-edible tissues of intensive animal farming intended for animal and human consumption. Such residues may pose serious health threat, depending on the type of food and the amount of residue present.

The aim of this review is to provide new insights about the clinical uses of TCs in humans and animals and their potential toxic effects as residues in the environment or as food components.

Keywords: Tetracycline antibiotics, Therapeutic applications, Toxicological effects, Companion animals, Residues, Food components.


TCs, firstly discovered in 1940's, belong to a class of antibiotics known to inhibit protein synthesis in a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, chlamydia, mycoplasma, rickettsia, and protozoan parasites [1].

Based on their nature (natural or synthetic), dosage, elimination time and frequency of administration TCs can be divided into 3 main classes [2, 3]. Class 1 includes Demethylchlortetracycline (DMCT), Oxytetracycline (OTC), Tetracycline (TET) and Chlortetracycline (CTC), have a short duration of action and are used in zootechny; class 2 includes demeclocycline and methacycline and have an intermediate duration of action; class 3 includes newer drugs such as Doxycycline (DOXY), glycylcyclines and Minocycline (MINO) and have a long duration of action. These two latter TCs are mostly employed to treat pet's diseases.

All TCs derivatives are crystalline and yellowish. They become characteristically fluorescent when exposed to ultraviolet light, which is an interesting property exploited to evaluate their accumulation in tissues. [4]. They are amphoteric, forming salts with strong acids (e.g. chloride) and bases (e.g. salts of sodium). The most common salt form is the hydrochloride, except for DOXY (hyclate or monohydrate). TCs are stable as dry powders but unstable in aqueous solution, particularly at a 7–8.5 pH range. TCs form poorly soluble chelates with bivalent and trivalent cations, particularly calcium, magnesium, aluminum, and iron. DOXY and MINO exhibit the greatest liposolubility and better penetration of bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus than does the group as a whole. Preparations for parenteral administration must be carefully formulated, often in propylene glycol or polyvinyl pyrrolidone with additional dispersing agents, to provide stable solutions.

TCs can permeate through the bacterial cell wall by passive diffusion and through the cytoplasmic membrane [5, 6], inducing protein synthesis inhibition, blocking attachment of amino acid-bearing tRNAs to the 16S part of the 30S subunit of prokaryote ribosomes [7].

They are more effective at a slightly acidic pH of 6–6.5 against multiplying microorganisms where protein synthesis is essential. They enter microorganisms in part by concentration-dependent diffusion and in part by an active energy-dependent carrier-mediated system. This dual absorption system is essentially responsible for the high concentrations achieved in susceptible bacteria.

TCs can be administered orally, topically, intramuscularly and intravenously [8]. Generally, their absorption ranges from 25 to 60% and mainly occur in the stomach, duodenum and small intestine, with a Cmax (mg/L) of 1–5 mg/L and a tmax of 2-4 h with the exception of demeclocycline whose Cmax is delayed until 4-6 h [9, 10]. However, absorption can also occur in the uterus and udder, although plasma concentrations remain low [11].

TCs can bind plasma proteins with different degrees (e.g. OTC, 30%; TET, 60%; DOXY, 90%) however, once absorbed, they widely diffuse into all tissues (including placenta, ovaries, testes, endocrine glands, skin) and secretions (e.g. bile, synovial liquid, and pleural fluids) [12]. However, due to the high affinity for liver, spleen and bone tissues, they are not homogeneously distributed. Moreover, calcium, aluminum, and magnesium can form insoluble chelates with TCs and decrease bioavailability [13].

All TCs are eliminated through the kidney and the liver biliary-GI tract [10]. Generally, 50 to 80% are observed in the urine with variations due to age, route of administration, urine pH, glomerular filtration rate, renal disease, and the TET used. There is a secondary significant enterohepatic elimination pathway with excretion by the bile after some liver metabolization. Biliary path accounts for 10 to 20% of the elimination, even with parenteral administration.

TCs act as ionophores forming lipid-soluble complexes with divalent metal cations such as Ca++ and Mg++, which they transport across hydrophobic barriers, such as biological membranes [3, 14]. If TCs help transporting calcium into the cell on one hand, this latter remains fixed in the bones for long periods being gradually released in the blood stream.

Due to their inexpensiveness TCs are widely used in the prophylaxis and therapy of human and animal infections but also as growth promoters in the intensive animal farming [1, 15, 16].

The widespread use of TCs raises the possibility that residues remain in edible tissues of livestock intended for animal and human consumption. Such residues may pose serious health threat, depending on the type of food and the amount of residue present [17].

The aim of this review is to provide new insights about the clinical uses of TCs in humans and animals and their potential toxic effects as residues in the environment or as food components


TCs have been recognized a safe and cheap class of antibiotics present on the pharmaceutical market, a feature that made them attractive for developing countries. TCs have been placed among the three most used antibiotics worldwide [18-20] endowed with antibacterial (respiratory infections [19], malaria [19], Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, Leishmania major, Trichomonas vaginalis and Toxoplasma gondii infections [1] and filarial nematodes [21]) and nonantibacterial activity:

2.1. Acne

Despite the worldwide rising concerns about antibiotic-resistant acne, TCs still represent the elective treatment of acne [22]. Different clinical trials aimed to establish the better tetracycline (TET, MINO, DOXY and lymecycline) and right dosage (40, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500 and 1000 mg), however, a lack of any significant difference in terms of efficacy between tested TCs was observed [23]. The main activity exerted by TCs in acne treatment is related to a reduction in neutrophil chemotaxis [24], sebum free fatty acids and extracellular lipases [25] as well as to an inhibitory effect on pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMP-9 and Propionibacterium acnes [23]. In particular this was observed for TET, MINO and DOXY [26, 27]. Serum samples from patients with acne treated with oral TET were challenged with zymosan and chemotaxis and random migration Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes (PMNLs) were investigated [24]. Both random migration and chemotaxis resulted significantly suppressed with the greatest effect at a daily dosage of 1 g, thus confirming the direct effect on neutrophil movement exerted by TCs.

2.2. Rosacea

Successful results have been also achieved with TCs for the treatment of rosacea, perioral dermatitis, ocular rosacea, and steroid-related rosacea [28, 29]. Along with aforementioned effects on the inflammatory condition, TCs are also supposed to inhibit angiogenesis (through MMP expression decrease) nitric oxide mediated vasodilation, downregulate inflammatory cytokines and reduce reactive oxygen species levels [30, 31]. Such skin disorder can be treated topically or systemically, while in the first case metronidazole and TCs (TET, MINO and DOXY (0.5% or 2%), remain are the most common treatments, in the second one metronidazole is advisable [32]. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of systemic TET, MINO, DOXY and OTC in controlling papulopustular rosacea and even reducing erythema has been reported [33, 34].

Modified-release DOXY capsules (30 mg/d immediate-release and 10 mg delayed-release beads) were given for up to 12 weeks in 826 patients (235 males and 591 females) with papulopustular (subtype 2) rosacea [33]. Significant improvements in severity rating and erythema were observed in both groups with a treatment success of 73.2% in males and a 75.2% in females, while adverse events, e.g. primarily mild or moderate gastrointestinal events, occurred in 9.9% of males and 12.8% of females. Similar results were achieved with same treatment in a study conducted on 826 patients with skin of color (Fitzpatrick Skin Types [FST] IV-VI) [34].

2.3. Bullous Dermatoses

TCs, in particular TET and MINO, have been shown to be effective in bullous dermatoses, Bullous Pemphigoid (BP) [35-38], cicatricial pemphigoid [39], linear IgA disease [40-42], and lichen planus pemphigoides [43] treatment that are characterized by a splitting or dissolution of the basement membrane accompanied by an inflammatory reaction involving lymphocytes and neutrophils [26]. Despite the lack of studies aimed to warren the effectiveness of TET in combination with Nicotinamide (NAM) with respect to the two single drugs administered as monotherapy, this combination represented a valuable alternative to corticosteroids in the initial treatment of bullous dermatoses. This option might represent an advantage for older patients with concomitant osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. Indeed, 4 case reports on elderly people with history of hypothyroidism and congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, mild pruritic blisters on the arms, legs, thighs, buttocks, and anterior aspect of the chest reported an significant improvements after a course of TET at different dosage, 1500 or 500 mg/d [35].

A combination of TET (500 mg/d) and NAM (500 mg/d) resulted particularly effective in the treatment of BP in 12 patients [36]. On the other hand, 6 patients were treated with Prednisone (PD). 5 out of 12 patients showed a complete response to combined therapy, while 5 had a partial response, 1 was unresponsive and 1 had a disease progression. Only 1 out of 6 patients treated with PD showed a complete response, while the other 5 had a partial response. Similar results were achieved in 7 patients with BP, who received 2 g TET combined with 2 g NAM daily for 7 months achieving a total remission within 6-8 weeks [37]. Nevertheless, BP has been also successfully treated with MINO as adjuvant therapy [38]. 6 out of 22 patients had a major response, 11 a minor response while 5 had no response. TET (2000 g/day) and niacinamide (NIAM) (1500 g/day) were also introduced as an alternative therapy to PD in a patient who showed gastric ulcers [39, 40]. After 3 weeks skin had completely cleared. Further, TET (2000 mg/day) and NAM (1500 g/day) was used to treat 13 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (n = 6), pemphigus foliaceus (n = 3), pemphigus erythematosus (n = 2) and linear IgA bullous dermatosis (n = 2), with or without oral corticosteroids [41]. After a mean follow-up period of 22 months 7 patients had a complete response, 4 a partial response while 2 failed to respond.

Oral TET (1000g/d) and NIAM (900 mg/d) were also successfully introduced in 2 patients with linear IgA bullous dermatosis [42]. After 2 weeks skin lesions resulted improved quickly and cleared and, after healing, milia formation and slight scarring were seen. Over maintenance period of 1 year on TET (500 mg/d) and NIAM (400 mg/d) patients showed no recurrence of pathology along with no adverse side effects. As to cicatricial pemphigoid treatment, Poskitt et al. described the effect of MINO (50 mg/d) in alleviating orodynia in 6 out of 7 patients and achieving a complete steroid withdrawal in 2 patients [39].

2.4. Cutaneous Sarcoidosis

Several reports shed light on the use of TCs in the treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis [44-48]. Bachelez et al. firstly reported the usefulness of MINO (200 mg daily for 12 months) in a cohort of 12 patients [48]. 8 out of 12 patients showed a complete clearing of their lesions, while only 2 showed a partial response. Although no relapse occurred in the treatment period, the overall length of response ranged from 10 to 41 months. Few years later, a 45-year-old woman with a 7-year history of subcutaneous nodules unsuccessfully treated with corticosteroids underwent a complete remission after a 6-month course of DOXY 200 mg/d [47]. Unfortunately, there is also evidence of TCs, i.e. MINO, long-term treatment side effects (papillary thyroid carcinoma) [46]. On the contrary, a study confirmed the effectiveness of MINO in 20 out of 27 patients with moderately extensive lesions (maculopapular, nodular, or plaque lesions on the face, torso, and/or extremities), and 2 with severe ulcerative lesions (scalp) [45]. Further, a 35-year-old man with a history of pulmonary sarcoidosis, who developed raised plaques within tattoos, achieved a complete resolution of pruritus within 4 days and improvement of sarcoidal plaques within one week after a course of MINO 100mg/b.i.d., thus suggesting the antibiotic as a valuable therapeutic option for cutaneous sarcoidosis [44].

2.5. Kaposi’s Sarcoma

Chemically modified TCs, i.e. COL-3 (6-dimethyl-6-deoxy-4-de(dimethylamino) tetracycline), were instead used in the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma, a pathology characterized by endothelial cells proliferation and MMP activity increase [26, 49, 50]. A phase I trial involved 18 patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma, who received 25, 50, or 70 mg/m2 of COL-3 per day for 25 weeks [50]. One out 18 patients patient showed complete resolution while 7 out 18 had partial improvement of skin lesions. The median therapy response time was 4 weeks and also MMP-2 serum levels resulted significantly reduced. Significant declines in MMP-2, and even in MMP-9, plasma levels were also observed in a phase II trial aimed to confirm and extend previous observations and to define more precisely the optimal drug dose [49]. Seventy-five patients were randomly divided in two groups that differed for the amount of COL-3 administered (group A received 50 mg and group B received 100 mg). The response rate in the group A was 41% while that of group B was 29%, thus placing COL-3 as a promising agent for the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma.

2.6. Miscellaneous Dermatoses

Although the presence of literature reports concerning the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum [51], hidradenitis suppurativa [52], Sweet’s syndrome [53, 54], a1-antitrypsin deficiency panniculitis [55], and chronic pityriasis lichenoides with TCs [56], well-controlled studies with a larger number of patients to warren the efficacy of such antibiotics are required. Piamphongsant et al. firstly described the usefullness of TC (2 g/d) in the treatment of pityriasis lichenoides [56]. After 6 months 5 out of 13 patients resulted completely cured, while 7 had to take the antibiotic 1 g/day for a further month to prevent relapse. On the other hand, MINO (100 mg b.i.d. for 6-12 months) was successfully treated 7 patients with pyoderma gangrenosum [51]. Further, DOXY was successfully introduced 3 patients with recurrent panniculitis associated with alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency due to its collagenase activity inhibition [55]. DOXY (100 mg b.i.d.) was also administered to 2 patients with Sweet’s syndrome. After 2 weeks of treatment, lesions completely resolved [53]. It is worth noting that a patient Sweet’s syndrome experienced an acute neutrophil dermatosis after systemic treatment with MINO [54]. The authors hypoyhesiszed a drug-induced condition after oral administration of TC and DOXY.

2.7. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Despite the unclear etiology of this pathology, a joint destruction and MMP-8 expression have been shown [57]. Many clinical trials described the significant improvements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with MINO [58-60]. The efficacy of MINO (200 mg/d) was confirmed by a 48-week trial on 109 patients [58]. An overall improvement in joint swelling, joint tenderness, hematocrit, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet count, and IgM rheumatoid factor levels were observed. MINO was also employed in the treatment of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis in the first year of disease [59]. 40 patients received MINO (100 mg b.i.d.) for 6 months. 18 out of 46 met 50% improvement criteria (modified Paulus composite criteria: morning stiffness, joint tenderness, joint swelling, ESR) at 3 months, and maintained at least a 50% improvement for 6 months with no significant drug toxicity. A similar result was observed in a 2-year study conducted on 60 patients who were also administered low-dose prednisone [60]. Patients were more likely to achieve a 50% improvement response along with a less requirement of prednisone.

2.8. Scleroderma

Literature reports are quite contradictory concerning the use of MINO in the treatment of this pathology [61, 62]. Indeed, in a first open trial 11 patients started receiving MINO (50 mg/ for 1 month and, after this period, it was increased up to 100 mg/b.i.d. Total skin score (TSS, 0 = normal, 1 = thickened skin, 2 = thickened, unable to move, and 3 = thickened, unable to pinch) and visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 cm = could not be better, 10 cm = could not be worse) were assessed before and at the end of the trial. After 1-year evaluation 4 out of 11 patients had a complete resolution of their disease with a final TSS score of 0 and in 3 of these patients VAS scores improved to 0. In 2 out of 11 patients no improvement in TSS was observed while only 1 of these had a significant improvement in VAS scores.

Conversely, results observed in 31 patients enrolled in an open-label multicenter trial showed no significant difference in TSS and modified Rodnan skin thickness score with respect to subjects treated with D-penicillamine.

2.9. Cancer

Tumor cell adhesion, extracellular matrix proteolysis, and cell migration are the main steps occurring in carcinogenesis, while basement membrane and surrounding connective tissue stroma degradation are key features of cancer invasion and metastasis along with MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression [26, 63, 64]. DOXY, MINO and CMTCs have been shown to inhibit MMPs activity and reduce cell proliferation [65-67]. Several clinical trials investigating the use of TCs in cancer treatment have been conducted [68-72].

A phase I clinical trial in 2001 aimed to establish the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of COL-3 in 30 patients with different cancer types [68]. Besides the recommendation for a dose of 36 mg/m2/d, authors reported disease stabilization for periods of 26+ months, 8 months, and 6 months in hemangioendothelioma, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, and fibrosarcoma, respectively.

DOXY (100 mg/b.i.d. orally, for 3 weeks), on the other hand, was also employed in 9 patients with ocular adnexal lymphomas, 4 due to Chlamydia psittaci (Cp) infection [69, 70]. After 1 month of DOXY assumption, Cp was no longer detectable in all 4 patients. Despite 7 out 9 patients responded to therapy, a complete response was observed in 2 out of 9 patients, while 2 other patients had a partial response and 3 a minimal response. Duration of response was 12+, 29+, 31+, 8+, 7+, 2+, and 1+ months, respectively. The same authors reported the usefulness of DOXY also in 27 patients (15 newly diagnosed and 12 having experienced relapse) with ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma and Cp infection [71]. 11 out of 27 patients were Cp DNA-positive and 16 negative. All patients received DOXY at a dosage of 100 mg/b.i.d. orally, for 3 weeks. At a 14-month follow-up lymphoma regression was complete in 6 patients, a partial response in 7 patients. Both Cp DNA-positive and negative patients experienced a regression of the lymphoma. Also previously irradiated and nonirradiated patients belonging to relapsed patients group showed a response to therapy. The 2-year failure-free survival rate of patients was 66% and 20 of the 27 patients were progression free.

A case report of a 66-year-old woman with lymphangioleiomyomatosis clearly showed the efficacy of DOXY (initial dose of 20 mg/day and after 1 month up to 100 mg/day for 6 months) as a promising therapy for such disease [72]. A clear improvement in the quality of life as well as increased lung capacity and oxygen saturation were observed along with MMPs urinary levels decrease.

COL-3, a chemically modified TC, was administered at a dosage of 50 mg/m2/d for 8 weeks to 15 patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma [69]. Despite de overall tolerability of the drug no objective responses were reported and 5 patients experienced disease progression.

2.10. Cardiovascular Diseases

MMPs production is known to occur before aortic wall elastin degradation, a condition that characterizes abdominal aortic aneurysm [26]. Patients treated with DOXY (100 mg p.o. bid) before abdominal aortic aneurysms surgical intervention showed a 3-fold reduction in aortic wall expression of MMP-2 and a 4-fold reduction in MMP-9 with respect to those untreated [73]. DOXY (150 mg daily) was also used to treat patients infected by Chlamydia pneumoniae with aneurysms of 30 mm [74]. Ultrasound investigations accomplished during an 18-month period evidenced a lower expansion rate of the aneurysm. Although DOXY had no clear effect on Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin G antibody titers, C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower after 6 months.

Further, patients with acute myocardial infarction showed a ≥ 10% reduction in PMNLs activity after 30 and 60 minutes after DOXY administration, thus indicating its effectiveness in reducing myocardial cell damage [75]. A randomized single-blinded open-label study from Srivastava et al. recently highlighted an improvement in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and modified Barthel Index score in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving MINO (200 mg/day for 5 days) at day 30 and 90 as compared with the controls [76]. These results clearly suggested the use of MINO in reducing acute ischemic stroke-related clinical deficits.

2.11. Periodontal Disease

The condition of periodontal inflammation is characterized by an increased apical proliferation and migration of gingival sulcular epithelial cells, periodontal microbial pathogens, and eventual destruction of collagen in the gingival, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone causing an irreversible loss of tooth attachment [26, 77]. An in vivo study clearly showed the expression of MMP-2, -7, -8, and -13 in gingival sulcular epithelium [77], which resulted inhibited by DOXY and CMTCs [78]. A clinical study showed significant improvement in tooth attachment as well as reduction of pocket depth and bleeding after submicrobial dose of DOXY (20 mg/b.i.d.) [79]. Interestingly, a tetracycline-loaded absorbent membrane along with scaling and root planning resulted in a better prognosis in the reduction of periodontal pockets of 12 patients after only 28 days of evaluation [80].

A further trial aimed to combine a sub-gingival debridement with a three-month regimen of sub-antimicrobial-dose of DOXY (SSD), or with a two-week regimen of DOXY (ADD) or with placebo in a pool of 45 patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes and untreated chronic periodontitis [81]. Clinical measures of periodontitis resulted decreased after 1 and 3 months, moreover, mean HbA1c levels in the SSD resulted reduced of 0.9% units with an overall improvement of 12.5%. No significant change in HbA1c was observed in ADD and placebo group. Such results provided a new point of view for the use of DOXY as parallel treatment of periodontitis with sub-gingival debridement and as hypoglycemic agent.

2.12. Brain Diseases

Besides DOXY, MMP-9, a protein expressed also in Fragile X syndrome, resulted pharmacologically down regulated after treatment with MINO [82]. The treatment also induced the rescue of immature dendritic spine morphology and a significant improvement of abnormal behavior. Due to its excellent penetration into cerebrospinal fluid, established neuroprotective and antiviral properties MINO was also successfully used in the initial management of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) [83]. 281 patients beyond 3 years of age, who were hospitalized with AES of ≤ 7 days, were randomly assigned to receive either nasogastric/oral MINO or placebo suspension. Despite the lack of significance in 3-month mortality between MINO and placebo group, encouraging trends in patients older than 12 years and in Glasgow Outcome Score were observed. These trends were even accentuated excluding patients who died within one day of reaching hospital.

Due to its beneficial effects observed in various neurologic disorders [84, 85], it has been also proposed the use of MINO in the treatment of schizophrenia [86]. Possible action mechanisms are the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase and blocking of nitric oxide-induced neurotoxicity, although effects on the dopaminergic system and microglial activation inhibition have been hypothesized. 54 out of 70 patients with early-phase schizophrenia were received a MINO dosage of 200 mg/d and were previously treated with risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or clozapine 200-600 mg/d. Few adverse events were reported while beneficial effects on negative symptoms and general outcome as well as on executive functions such as working memory, cognitive shifting, and cognitive planning.


As previously mentioned, TCs, in particular OTC and DOXY, are nowadays widely employed to prevent disease, reduce morbidity and mortality and increase overall development in production animals [1, 87, 88]. The improvement in daily growth rates resulting from the use of growth promoters was evaluated between 1 and 10 per cent, with more meat, less fat and increased protein content [89].

On a world scale, the use of antibiotics as animal growth promoters differs dramatically but is still frightening [90]. 25% of total antimicrobials were used in the pre-starter and starter phases, while the rest was used in the grower and finisher phases.

However, some countries like the EU forbid the use of antibiotics for growth promotion purposes, while the USA still uses and allows a wide range of antibiotics. To justify the use of antibiotics, the Animal Health Institute of America (AHI) estimated that, without the use of growth promoting antibiotics, the USA would require an additional 452 million chickens, 12 million pigs and 23 million more cattle [91]. Indeed, mortality rates associated with scouring and proliferative enteritis are 10-15 per cent lower for countries using antibiotics compared with countries that do not use antimicrobial growth promoters. In poultry, antimicrobial growth promoters (i.e. TCs) also control infections (i.e. Clostridium perfringens), which are potentially fatal, in addition to improve feed conversion efficiency. It was estimated that only this effect translated into an improvement of 1.5 per cent, with added economic benefits from just the reduction of C. perfringens infections without even considering other diseases [92]. In addition, it is worth noting that TCs have been employed also as healing agent for digital dermatitis treatment in dairy cattle [93]. For those reasons, pigs, livestock and poultry are still exposed to a huge range of antimicrobials while the long term effect on the environment, besides antibiotic resistance [94, 95], or effects, when consumed by the animal or human species, on the overall individual health status have been partially investigated. As annual production and consumption increase, increasing volumes of antimicrobials will be used each year if nothing is done to reduce their usage with a consequent increase of antimicrobial resistant organisms. Indeed, a 2014 study conducted on animal feed (fish, poultry, swine and shrimp) feed marketed in Costa Rica revealed worrisome concentrations of TCs along with great abundance of OTC-resistant bacteria from the genera Staphylococcus and Bacillus [96]. In particular, fish feed contained the highest amounts of TCs (119–8365 mg/kg), poultry (78–438 mg/kg), swine (41–1076 mg/kg) and shrimp (21.5– 50.3 mg/kg) with an OTC MIC50 > 256 μg/ml for fish and poultry feed and 192 μg/ml for swine. In this regard clinical studies were conducted to establish the rational dosage for some TCs against resistant bacteria [96, 97].

Conversely, to give an idea of the manifold ways through which TCs are daily delivered by human and pet food, it is noteworthy to mention a 2009 report conducted on 24 commercially available chicken drumsticks [98]. All samples showed important concentrations of OTC and TET ranging from 83.0 to 2049.3 μg/kg and from 197.8 to 2564.3 μg/kg, respectively. A further study conducted by Nonga et al. on commercial chicken eggs sold by smallholder farmers in Tanzania confirmed the presence of OTC in all analyzed samples and interestingly revealed the lack of awareness of the farmers concerning the potential toxic effect of such compound on human health [99]. In 2014, Odore et al. firstly conducted a pilot trial aimed to clearly establish the amount of OTC present within the bone of broiler chickens reared according appropriate withdrawal times [100]. OTC concentration was far below the established maximum residue levels (100 μg/kg) in the muscle while resulted about 100-fold higher in the bone, posing a serious treat for the health of animals and humans that daily assume amounts of chicken and chicken byproducts, including bone, through pet food and würstel sausages possibly fostering chronic inflammatory phenomena [101, 102].

For instance, such inflammatory phenomena may manifest with clinical symptoms such as drooling, back and neck intense itching, neck eczema, chronic conjunctivitis and stomatitis, which are generally regarded as adverse food reactions [101]. In 2017, a clinical study firstly posed a possible link between the onset of these cutaneous reactions and a chronic intake of a chicken-based diet in a pool of 18 cats [101]. The authors performed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to evaluate the presence of OTC in the sera of the animals before and after a 60-days nutraceutical diet supplementation (without chicken or chicken byproducts). Interestingly, a significant decrease of serum OTC along with a significant improvement of clinical symptoms was observed at the end of the study. This observation posed a serious concern on an anything but hypothetic pro-inflammatory effect exerted by OTC assumed by a daily intake of contaminated food. This latter consideration was confirmed by Di Cerbo et al. who conducted a clinical evaluation on 8 dogs consuming chicken-based commercial diets correlating the appearance of symptoms such as otitis, diarrhea, generalized anxiety and dermatitis with the presence of OTC (19.0 ± 3.7 μg/kg) and calcium, aluminum, silicon, and phosphorous nanoparticles in the kibbles [15]. ELISA revealed also a significant reduction of serum concentration of OTC in all dogs, from 0.22 to 0.02 μg/mL, after 15 days of organic chicken-based diet supplementation, which was associated with an overall significant reduction of the symptoms. Interestingly, OTC serum concentration resulted quite below the cytotoxic concentration observed in vitro for its powder and liquid form.


Several studies highlighted the effects of the OTC on the immune system [100, 103-106], on reactive species and pro-inflammatory molecules (cytokines, myeloperoxidase, malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase) [103, 105, 107, 108], transcription of the cytochrome P-450 [104, 109] and even on DNA [110].

First experiments carried out with TCs revealed a cytostatic effect through the inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis [111]. However, since then, further studies showed contradictory results on haemopoietic cells. For instance, Van de Bogert et al. reported a T cell proliferation inhibition exerted by OTC while Potts and coworkers observed an antiproliferative effect on human PBMCs only for DOXY, demeclocycline, methacycline and MINO [112, 113]. Moreover, as with zymosan, DOXY, lymecycline, CTC, MINO and DMCT were able to induce an increase in oxygen consumption in PMNLs once exposed to UV light [114]. Zymosan, but also bacteria, were used to challenge bovine blood mononuclear cells and neutrophils pretreated with OTC [103]. An antibacterial activity inhibition of neutrophils at high concentrations of OTC (500-1,000 μg/ml) and a decreased peroxidase activity at a concentration of 15 μg/ml were observed. Conversely, bovine blood mononuclear cells proliferation resulted inhibited at an OTC concentration of 100 μg/ml, indicating the greater sensitivity of these latter with respect to neutrophils. Besides the countless evaluations aimed to investigate the effect of TCs challenge with immune system, adverse inflammatory effects, due to persistence of these antibiotics in the environment, were also evaluated [109]. Interestingly, zebrafish larvae exposed to OTC for a period of 24 to 96 hours developed a widespread inflammation and showed an improved regeneration capacity in the mechanosensory system lateral line. Experimental fish were also investigated for OTC-induced oxidative stress evaluation [104]. Yonar et al. reported a significant increase in the malondialdehyde level, and a decrease in superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activity of OTC-treated rainbow trout. The authors also observed a decrease in the glutathione level and a significant increase in glutathione-S-transferase in the blood, liver, kidney and spleen of the animals. Further, specific and nonspecific immune system parameters including haematocrit, leucocyte count, oxidative radical production, total plasma protein and immunoglobulin levels and phagocytic activity appeared to be suppressed by the antibiotic.

In 2015, for the first time, a study evaluated the effect of a bone derived by intensive farming chickens treated with OTC on two hematopoietic cell lines, K562 cell and PBMCs [100]. Chicken bone meal is known to be one of the constituents of pet food and, to a less extent, of human food [16, 101, 115]. Results evidenced a significant pro-apoptotic effect of the bone meal on both cell lines at 48h of incubation at different dilutions. However, further experiments on K562 cells challenged with OTC for different incubation times, showed apoptotic features (i.e. blebs formation) already after 12h of incubation by means of Micropipette Aspiration technique [106].

The same bone meal was used to assess its possible pro-inflammatory effects on human PBMCs [105]. A significant interferon-gamma (IFN)-γ secretion from T lymphocytes and non-T cells was observed in the first 10–12 h of cell exposure, paving the way for the hypothesis that OTC-enriched bone might be responsible for a tissue inflammatory spreading or of immune-mediated diseases. These results firstly suggested new potential health risks for humans and pets depending on the entry of TCs in the food supply chain.

Later, Gallo et al. shed light on molecular mechanisms related to OTC toxicity on human PBMCs [110]. They observed the expression of DNA damage features including ATM and p53 activation, H2AX histone phosphorylation and modifications of histone H3 methylation of lysine K4 in the chromatin, which were linked to a marked inflammatory response as evidenced by an increased expression of IFN-γ and type 1 superoxide dismutase (SOD1).

Recently, cell viability and HPLC-ESI/QqToF assays confirmed the cytotoxic effect of bone derived by intensive farming chickens treated with OTC at 24, 48 and 72h of incubation but ruled out the possible release of OTC and its derivatives from the bone until a concentration of 1 μg/mL [116].


Presence of antibiotic residues in carcasses poses a health risk to consumers in terms of antibiotic resistance, teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, endocrine disruptors, hepatic and renal failure. However, embryonic, fetal, chronic or short term and long term immune effects have not been seriously considered. To prevent those problems and safeguard health, the European Union and more recently the USA have fixed Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) of those compounds in livestock products [117, 118]. On the other hand, very few studies described the fate and toxicity of TCs in the environment, which are omnipresent in most of ecological compartments [119] and are far to be biodegradable once released in the environment. Moreover, since humans and animals do not fully absorb or metabolize those pharmaceuticals, they excrete a significant fraction of such drugs (from 30 to 90%) or of their breakdown products in the environment via feces or urine [120, 121], which in turn enter in the environment through the direct discharge of animal wastewater and the discharge of effluents from wastewater treatment plants [122, 123]. Up-to-now, wastewater treatment plants are not capable of removing effectively TCs. They have been detected in USA surface water samples at concentrations of 0.11, 1.34 and 0.15 μg/L, for TET, CTC and OTC, respectively [124] and residual concentrations of TET from 0.15 to 0.97 μg/L were detected in Canada [125] while up to 2.37 μg/L were detected in the final effluent from wastewater treatment plants in the USA [126]. TCs have been found also in sewage sludge, that represents one of the major routes of spread of those compounds in the environment [127]. Further, they can accumulate within organic manure in soil. In most investigations, residual concentrations of TET, CTC and OTC were detected in soil with amounts up to 2.683 mg/Kg, whereas residual concentrations of up to 183.5 mg/kg were detected in manure [128]. In Table 1 human and veterinary clinical application of TCs as well as their potential toxic effects have been summarized.

Table 1. Human and veterinary clinical application and potential toxic effects of TCs.
Doxycycline Toxoplasma gondii infection [1], respiratory infections [19, 129], malaria [131], acne [27], rosacea [29, 33, 34], cutaneous sarcoidosis [47], Sweet’s syndrome [53], a1-antitrypsin deficiency panniculitis [55], leukemia [65, 67], ocular adnexal lymphomas [70], ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma [71], lymphangioleiomyomatosis [72], abdominal aortic aneurysms [73], Chlamydia pneumonia infection with aneurysms [74], acute myocardial infarction [75], periodontal disease [78, 79], long-standing type-2 diabetes and untreated chronic periodontitis [81] filarial nematodes [21, 130], Leishmania major infection (Leishmaniasis) [131], disease prevention, morbidity and mortality reduction and growth promotion [87, 88] DNA synthesis reduction [112], polymorphonuclear leukocyte oxygen consumption reduction [114], environmental, manure, soil, surface waters, groundwater and wastewater pollution [119, 123-125]
Achromycin malaria [19, 132]
Oxytetracycline Entamoeba histolytica infection (Amebiasis) [133, 134], Trichomonas vaginalis infection (Trichomoniasis) and Leishmania major infection (Leishmaniasis) [135], Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [133, 135], food intolerances induction [115] Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [133], disease prevention, morbidity and mortality reduction and growth promotion [87, 88, 127], adverse food reactions induction [15, 101] pro-apoptotic effect [100, 106], pro-inflammatory effect [105, 107, 109], genotoxic effect [110], neutrophils and mononuclear cells modulation [103], oxidative stress and immunosuppression induction [104], toxicity against catalase [108], villous epithelium damage [111], T lymphoid cells division inhibition [113], cytotoxic [116], environmental, manure, soil, surface waters, groundwater pollution [119, 123, 124, 128]
Tetracycline Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [133, 135], filarial nematodes [136], acne [24], rosacea [28], bullous pemphigoid [35-37, 40-42], suppurative hidradenitis [52], chronic pityriasis lichenoides [56], metastatic prostate cancer [66] filarial nematodes [21], Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [133], Leishmania major infection (Leishmaniasis) [131], digital dermatitis [93] environmental, manure, soil, and surface waters, groundwater and wastewater pollution [120, 123-124-125]
Thiatetracycline Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [134] Giardia lamblia infection (Giardiasis) [134]
Minocycline Toxoplasma gondii infection [1], acne [26], cicatricial pemphigoid [38, 39], cutaneous sarcoidosis [44-46], pyoderma gangrenosum [51], rheumatoid arthritis [58-60], scleroderma [61, 62], acute ischemic stroke [76], fragile X syndrome [82], acute encephalitis syndrome [83], schizophrenia [86] filarial nematodes [137] groundwater and
surface water pollution [124]
COL-3 Kaposi’s sarcoma [49, 50], refractory metastatic cancer [68, 69]
CMT-1, -3, and -5 periodontal disease [78]
Demethylchlortetracycline polymorphonuclear leukocyte oxygen consumption reduction [114]
Chlortetracycline growth promotion [88, 89, 127] manure, soil, surface waters and groundwater pollution [123, 124, 128]
Meclocycline manure, soil, surface waters and groundwater pollution [123, 124]

Besides the contradictory results achieved with TCs we retain that their abuse and the consequent introduction into the environment can lead to serious environmental problems including ecological risk, animal and human health damage and even antibiotic resistance.


Not applicable.


The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.


Declared none.


[1] Chopra I, Roberts M. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2001; 65(2): 232-60. [second page, table of contents.].
[2] Golub LM, Suomalainen K, Sorsa T. Host modulation with tetracyclines and their chemically modified analogues. Curr Opin Dent 1992; 2: 80-90.
[3] Nelson ML. Chemical and biological dynamics of tetracyclines. Adv Dent Res 1998; 12(2): 5-11.
[4] Kühne M, Ihnen D, Möller G, Agthe O. Stability of tetracycline in water and liquid manure. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2000; 47(6): 379-84.
[5] Franklin TJ. Uptake of tetracycline by membrane preparations from Escherichia coli. Biochem J 1971; 123(2): 267-73.
[6] Yamaguchi A, Ohmori H, Kaneko-Ohdera M, Nomura T, Sawai T. Delta pH-dependent accumulation of tetracycline in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35(1): 53-6.
[7] Brodersen DE, Clemons WM Jr, Carter AP, Morgan-Warren RJ, Wimberly BT, Ramakrishnan V. The structural basis for the action of the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B on the 30S ribosomal subunit. Cell 2000; 103(7): 1143-54.
[8] Riviere JE, Papich MG. Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2013.
[9] Fabre J, Milek E, Kalfopoulos P, Mérier G. [Kinetics of tetracyclines in human. II. Excretion, penetration into normal and inflammed tissues, behavior in a case of renal insufficiency and in hemodialysis]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1971; 101(18): 625-33. [Kinetics of tetracyclines in human. II. Excretion, penetration into normal and inflammed tissues, behavior in a case of renal insufficiency and in hemodialysis].
[10] Agwuh KN, MacGowan A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the tetracyclines including glycylcyclines. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58(2): 256-65.
[12] Gialdroni Grassi G. Tetracyclines-extending the atypical spectrum. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1993; 3(Suppl. 1): S31-46.
[13] Neuvonen PJ. Interactions with the absorption of tetracyclines. Drugs 1976; 11(1): 45-54.
[14] White JR, Pearce FL. Characterization of chlortetracycline (aureomycin) as a calcium ionophore. Biochemistry 1982; 21(24): 6309-12.
[15] Di Cerbo A, Canello S, Guidetti G, et al. Adverse food reactions in dogs due to antibiotic residues in pet food: a preliminary study. Vet Ital 2018.
[16] Palmieri B, Di Cerbo A, Laurino C. Antibiotic treatments in zootechnology and effects induced on the food chain of domestic species and, comparatively, the human specie. Nutr Hosp 2014; 29(6): 1427-33.
[17] Oka H, Ito Y, Matsumoto H. Chromatographic analysis of tetracycline antibiotics in foods. J Chromatogr A 2000; 882(1-2): 109-33.
[18] Borghi AA, Palma MSA. Tetracycline: Production, waste treatment and environmental impact assessment. Braz J Pharm Sci 2014; 50: 25-40.
[19] Roberts MC. Tetracycline therapy: update. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(4): 462-7.
[20] Gu C, Karthikeyan KG. Interaction of tetracycline with aluminum and iron hydrous oxides. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39(8): 2660-7.
[21] Smith HL, Rajan TV. Tetracycline inhibits development of the infective-stage larvae of filarial nematodes in vitro. Exp Parasitol 2000; 95(4): 265-70.
[22] Dréno B, Bettoli V, Ochsendorf F, Layton A, Mobacken H, Degreef H. European recommendations on the use of oral antibiotics for acne. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14(6): 391-9.
[23] Simonart T, Dramaix M, De Maertelaer V. Efficacy of tetracyclines in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A review. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158(2): 208-16.
[24] Esterly NB, Koransky JS, Furey NL, Trevisan M. Neutrophil chemotaxis in patients with acne receiving oral tetracycline therapy. Arch Dermatol 1984; 120(10): 1308-13.
[25] Plewig G, Kligman A M. ACNE and ROSACEA 3. 2000; XIV, 744.
[26] Sapadin AN, Fleischmajer R. Tetracyclines: nonantibiotic properties and their clinical implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54(2): 258-65.
[27] Skidmore R, Kovach R, Walker C, et al. Effects of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline in the treatment of moderate acne. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139(4): 459-64.
[28] Macdonald A, Feiwel M. Perioral dermatitis: Aetiology and treatment with tetracycline. Br J Dermatol 1972; 87(4): 315-9.
[29] Frucht-Pery J, Chayet AS, Feldman ST, Lin S, Brown SI. The effect of doxycycline on ocular rosacea. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107(4): 434-5.
[30] Wilkin JK. Rosacea. Pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130(3): 359-62.
[31] Two AM, Wu W, Gallo RL, Hata TR. Rosacea: part II. Topical and systemic therapies in the treatment of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72(5): 761-70.
[32] Davis SA, Feldman SR. Patterns of ambulatory care usage and leading treatments for rosacea. J Dermatolog Treat 2014; 25(4): 275-7.
[33] Del Rosso JQ, Preston NJ, Caveney SW, Gottschalk RW. Effectiveness and safety of modified-release doxycycline capsules once daily for papulopustular rosacea monotherapy results from a large community-based trial in subgroups based on gender. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11(6): 703-7.
[34] Alexis AF, Webster G, Preston NJ, Caveney SW, Gottschalk RW. Effectiveness and safety of once-daily doxycycline capsules as monotherapy in patients with rosacea: An analysis by Fitzpatrick skin type. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11(10): 1219-22.
[35] Berk MA, Lorincz AL. The treatment of bullous pemphigoid with tetracycline and niacinamide. A preliminary report. Arch Dermatol 1986; 122(6): 670-4.
[36] Fivenson DP, Breneman DL, Rosen GB, Hersh CS, Cardone S, Mutasim D. Nicotinamide and tetracycline therapy of bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130(6): 753-8.
[37] Kolbach DN, Remme JJ, Bos WH, et al. Bullous pemphigoid successfully controlled by tetracycline and nicotinamide. Br J Dermatol 1995; 133(1): 88-90.
[38] Loo WJ, Kirtschig G, Wojnarowska F. Minocycline as a therapeutic option in bullous pemphigoid. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26(5): 376-9.
[39] Poskitt L, Wojnarowska F. Minimizing cicatricial pemphigoid orodynia with minocycline. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132(5): 784-9.
[40] Peoples D, Fivenson DP. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis: Successful treatment with tetracycline and nicotinamide. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26(3 Pt 2): 498-9.
[41] Chaffins ML, Collison D, Fivenson DP. Treatment of pemphigus and linear IgA dermatosis with nicotinamide and tetracycline: A review of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28(6): 998-1000.
[42] Yomada M, Komai A, Hashimato T. Sublamina densa-type linear IgA bullous dermatosis successfully treated with oral tetracycline and niacianamide. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141(3): 608-9.
[43] Fivenson DP, Kimbrough TL. Lichen planus pemphigoides: combination therapy with tetracycline and nicotinamide. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36(4): 638-40.
[44] Sheu J, Saavedra AP, Mostaghimi A. Rapid response of tattoo-associated cutaneous sarcoidosis to minocycline: Case report and review of the literature. Dermatol Online J 2014; 20(8): 13030/qt6dd1m2j9.
[45] Steen T, English JC. Oral minocycline in treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis. JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149(6): 758-60.
[46] Bruins NA, Oswald JE, Morreau H, Kievit J, Pavel S, Smelt AH. Papillary thyroid carcinoma in a patient with sarcoidosis treated with minocycline. Neth J Med 2007; 65(5): 185-7.
[47] El Sayed F, Dhaybi R, Ammoury A. Subcutaneous nodular sarcoidosis and systemic involvement successfully treated with doxycycline. J Med Liban 2006; 54(1): 42-4.
[48] Bachelez H, Senet P, Cadranel J, Kaoukhov A, Dubertret L. The use of tetracyclines for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(1): 69-73.
[49] Dezube BJ, Krown SE, Lee JY, Bauer KS, Aboulafia DM. Randomized phase II trial of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor COL-3 in AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: an AIDS Malignancy Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(9): 1389-94.
[50] Cianfrocca M, Cooley TP, Lee JY, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor COL-3 in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: a phase I AIDS malignancy consortium study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(1): 153-9.
[51] Mrcp JB-J, Tan SV, Graham-Brown RAC, Pembroke AC. The successful use of minocycline in pyoderma gangrenosum—a report of seven cases and review of the literature. J Dermatolog Treat 1989; 1(1): 23-5.
[52] Jemec GB, Wendelboe P. Topical clindamycin versus systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39(6): 971-4.
[53] Joshi RK, Atukorala DN, Abanmi A, al Khamis O, Haleem A. Successful treatment of Sweet’s syndrome with doxycycline. Br J Dermatol 1993; 128(5): 584-6.
[54] Khan Durani B, Jappe U. Drug-induced Sweet’s syndrome in acne caused by different tetracyclines: case report and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147(3): 558-62.
[55] Humbert P, Faivre B, Gibey R, Agache P. Use of anti-collagenase properties of doxycycline in treatment of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency panniculitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1991; 71(3): 189-94.
[56] Piamphongsant T. Tetracycline for the treatment of pityriasis lichenoides. Br J Dermatol 1974; 91(3): 319-22.
[57] Hanemaaijer R, Sorsa T, Konttinen YT, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 is expressed in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Regulation by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and doxycycline. J Biol Chem 1997; 272(50): 31504-9.
[58] Tilley BC, Alarcón GS, Heyse SP, et al. Minocycline in rheumatoid arthritis. A 48-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122(2): 81-9.
[59] O’Dell JR, Haire CE, Palmer W, et al. Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis with minocycline or placebo: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40(5): 842-8.
[60] O’Dell JR, Blakely KW, Mallek JA, et al. Treatment of early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: a two-year, double-blind comparison of minocycline and hydroxychloroquine. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44(10): 2235-41.
[61] Mayes MD, O’Donnell D, Rothfield NF, Csuka ME. Minocycline is not effective in systemic sclerosis: Results of an open-label multicenter trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50(2): 553-7.
[62] Le CH, Morales A, Trentham DE. Minocycline in early diffuse scleroderma. Lancet 1998; 352(9142): 1755-6.
[63] Stetler-Stevenson WG, Liotta LA, Kleiner DE Jr. Extracellular matrix 6: Role of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion and metastasis. FASEB J 1993; 7(15): 1434-41.
[64] Westermarck J, Kähäri VM. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in tumor invasion. FASEB J 1999; 13(8): 781-92.
[65] Wang C, Xiang R, Zhang X, Chen Y. Doxycycline inhibits leukemic cell migration via inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases and phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. Mol Med Rep 2015; 12(3): 3374-80.
[66] Lokeshwar BL, Selzer MG, Zhu BQ, Block NL, Golub LM. Inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion, tumor growth and metastasis by an oral non-antimicrobial tetracycline analog (COL-3) in a metastatic prostate cancer model. Int J Cancer 2002; 98(2): 297-309.
[67] Rubins JB, Charboneau D, Alter MD, Bitterman PB, Kratzke RA. Inhibition of mesothelioma cell growth in vitro by doxycycline. J Lab Clin Med 2001; 138(2): 101-6.
[68] Rudek MA, Figg WD, Dyer V, et al. Phase I clinical trial of oral COL-3, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(2): 584-92.
[69] Chu QS, Forouzesh B, Syed S, et al. A phase II and pharmacological study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI) COL-3 in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Invest New Drugs 2007; 25(4): 359-67.
[70] Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Guidoboni M, et al. Regression of ocular adnexal lymphoma after Chlamydia psittaci-eradicating antibiotic therapy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(22): 5067-73.
[71] Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Guidoboni M, et al. Bacteria-eradicating therapy with doxycycline in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: a multicenter prospective trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98(19): 1375-82.
[72] Moses MA, Harper J, Folkman J. Doxycycline treatment for lymphangioleiomyomatosis with urinary monitoring for MMPs. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(24): 2621-2.
[73] Thompson RW, Baxter BT. MMP inhibition in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Rationale for a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 878: 159-78.
[74] Mosorin M, Juvonen J, Biancari F, et al. Use of doxycycline to decrease the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34(4): 606-10.
[75] Takeshita S, Ono Y, Kozuma K, et al. Modulation of oxidative burst of neutrophils by doxycycline in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49(2): 411-3.
[76] Padma Srivastava MV, Bhasin A, Bhatia R, et al. Efficacy of minocycline in acute ischemic stroke: a single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Neurol India 2012; 60(1): 23-8.
[77] Tervahartiala T, Pirilä E, Ceponis A, et al. The in vivo expression of the collagenolytic matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, -8, -13, and -14) and matrilysin (MMP-7) in adult and localized juvenile periodontitis. J Dent Res 2000; 79(12): 1969-77.
[78] Grenier D, Plamondon P, Sorsa T, et al. Inhibition of proteolytic, serpinolytic, and progelatinase-b activation activities of periodontopathogens by doxycycline and the non-antimicrobial chemically modified tetracycline derivatives. J Periodontol 2002; 73(1): 79-85.
[79] Ciancio S, Ashley R. Safety and efficacy of sub-antimicrobial-dose doxycycline therapy in patients with adult periodontitis. Adv Dent Res 1998; 12(2): 27-31.
[80] Soares PB, de Menezes HH, Naves MM, Taga EM, de Magalhães D. Effect of absorbent tetracycline-loaded membrane used in the reduction of periodontal pockets: An in vivo study. Braz Dent J 2009; 20(5): 414-8.
[81] Engebretson SP, Hey-Hadavi J. Sub-antimicrobial doxycycline for periodontitis reduces hemoglobin A1c in subjects with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. Pharmacol Res 2011; 64(6): 624-9.
[82] Dziembowska M, Pretto DI, Janusz A, et al. High MMP-9 activity levels in fragile X syndrome are lowered by minocycline. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A(8): 1897-903.
[83] Kumar R, Basu A, Sinha S, et al. Role of oral Minocycline in acute encephalitis syndrome in India - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16: 67.
[84] O’Connor JC, Lawson MA, André C, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior is mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activation in mice. Mol Psychiatry 2009; 14(5): 511-22.
[85] Soczynska JK, Mansur RB, Brietzke E, et al. Novel therapeutic targets in depression: minocycline as a candidate treatment. Behav Brain Res 2012; 235(2): 302-17.
[86] Levkovitz Y, Mendlovich S, Riwkes S, et al. A double-blind, randomized study of minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71(2): 138-49.
[87] Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 2008; 29: 151-69.
[88] Granados-Chinchilla F, Rodríguez C. Tetracyclines in food and feedingstuffs: from regulation to analytical methods, bacterial resistance, and environmental and health implications. J Anal Methods Chem 2017; 2017: 1315497.
[89] Al-Dobaib SN, Mirghani Mousa H. Benefits and risks of growth promoters in animal production. J Food Agric Environ 2009; 7(2): 202-8.
[90] Hughes P, Heritage J. Antibiotic growth-promoters in food animals.Assessing quality and safety of animal feeds 160. 2004; 129-52.
[91] Mellon MG, Benbrook C, Benbrook KL, Scientists UC. Hogging it: Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock 2001.
[92] Australia. Joint Expert Technical Advisory Committee on Antibiotic, R., The use of antibiotics in food-producing animals : antibiotic-resistant bacteria in animals and humans / report of the Joint Expert Advisory Committee on Antibiotic Resistance (JETACAR).Commonwealth Dept of Health and Aged Care [and] Commonwealth Dept of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: 1999.
[93] Cutler JH, Cramer G, Walter JJ, Millman ST, Kelton DF. Randomized clinical trial of tetracycline hydrochloride bandage and paste treatments for resolution of lesions and pain associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96(12): 7550-7.
[94] Kempf I, Le Roux A, Perrin-Guyomard A, et al. Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys. Vet J 2013; 198(2): 398-403.
[95] Græsbøll K, Damborg P, Mellerup A, et al. Effect of tetracycline dose and treatment mode on selection of resistant coliform bacteria in nursery pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83(12): e00538-17.
[96] Granados-Chinchilla F, Alfaro M, Chavarría G, Rodríguez C. Unravelling a vicious circle: Animal feed marketed in Costa Rica contains irregular concentrations of tetracyclines and abundant oxytetracycline-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2014; 31(6): 1017-25.
[97] Maaland MG, Guardabassi L, Papich MG. Minocycline pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in dogs: dosage recommendations for treatment of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infections. Vet Dermatol 2014; 25(3): 182-e47.
[98] Miranda JM, Rodríguez JA, Galán-Vidal CA. Simultaneous determination of tetracyclines in poultry muscle by capillary zone electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 2009; 1216(15): 3366-71.
[99] Nonga HE, Simon C, Karimuribo ED, Mdegela RH. Assessment of antimicrobial usage and residues in commercial chicken eggs from smallholder poultry keepers in Morogoro municipality, Tanzania. Zoonoses Public Health 2010; 57(5): 339-44.
[100] Odore R, De Marco M, Gasco L, et al. Cytotoxic effects of oxytetracycline residues in the bones of broiler chickens following therapeutic oral administration of a water formulation. Poult Sci 2015; 94(8): 1979-85.
[101] Mazzeranghi F, Zanotti C, Di Cerbo A, et al. Clinical efficacy of nutraceutical diet for cats with clinical signs of cutaneus adverse food reaction (CAFR). Pol J Vet Sci 2017; 20(2): 269-76.
[102] Maine IR, Atterbury R, Chang KC. Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods. Acta Vet Scand 2015; 57: 7.
[103] Myers MJ, Farrell DE, Henderson M. In vitro modulation of bovine blood neutrophils and mononuclear cells by oxytetracycline. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56(8): 1007-11.
[104] Yonar ME. The effect of lycopene on oxytetracycline-induced oxidative stress and immunosuppression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, W.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2012; 32(6): 994-1001.
[105] Di Cerbo A, Palatucci AT, Rubino V, et al. Toxicological implications and inflammatory response in human lymphocytes challenged with oxytetracycline. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2016; 30(4): 170-7.
[106] Di Cerbo A, Rubino V, Morelli F, et al. Mechanical phenotyping of K562 cells by the Micropipette Aspiration Technique allows identifying mechanical changes induced by drugs. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 1219.
[107] Guidetti G, Di Cerbo A, Giovazzino A, et al. In Vitro Effects of Some Botanicals with Anti-Inflammatory and Antitoxic Activity. J Immunol Res 2016; 2016: 5457010.
[108] Chi Z, Liu R, Zhang H. Potential enzyme toxicity of oxytetracycline to catalase. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408(22): 5399-404.
[109] Barros-Becker F, Romero J, Pulgar A, Feijóo CG. Persistent oxytetracycline exposure induces an inflammatory process that improves regenerative capacity in zebrafish larvae. PLoS One 2012; 7(5): e36827.
[110] Gallo A, Landi R, Rubino V, et al. Oxytetracycline induces DNA damage and epigenetic changes: A possible risk for human and animal health? PeerJ 2017; 5: e3236.
[111] de Jonge HR, Hülsmann WC. Inhibition of mitochondrial-protein synthesis in rat small-intestinal epithelium. Eur J Biochem 1973; 32(2): 356-64.
[112] Potts RC, MacConnachie A, Brown RA, et al. Some tetracycline drugs suppress mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte growth but others do not. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1983; 16(2): 127-32.
[113] Van den Bogert C, Kroon AM. Effects of oxytetracycline on in vivo proliferation and differentiation of erythroid and lymphoid cells in the rat. Clin Exp Immunol 1982; 50(2): 327-35.
[114] Glette J, Sandberg S, Haneberg B, Solberg CO. Effect of tetracyclines and UV light on oxygen consumption by human leukocytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984; 26(4): 489-92.
[115] Di Cerbo A, Canello S, Guidetti G, Laurino C, Palmieri B. Unusual antibiotic presence in gym trained subjects with food intolerance; a case report. Nutr Hosp 2014; 30(2): 395-8.
[116] Di Cerbo A, Scarano A, Pezzuto F, et al. Oxytetracycline-Protein Complex: The Dark Side of Pet Food. Open Public Health J 2018; 11: 162-9.
[117] Agency, U. E. P., Food and Drugs.. PART 556 -Tolerances for residues of new animal drugs in food. Subpart B-Specific Tolerances for Residues of New Animal Drugs. Electronic code of federal regulations (eCFR)
[118] Communities, T. C. o. t. E., amending Annexes I and III to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Communities 1996; 37
[119] Yuan F, Hu C, Hu X, Wei D, Chen Y, Qu J. Photodegradation and toxicity changes of antibiotics in UV and UV/H(2)O(2) process. J Hazard Mater 2011; 185(2-3): 1256-63.
[120] Chee-Sanford JC, Aminov RI, Krapac IJ, Garrigues-Jeanjean N, Mackie RI. Occurrence and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater underlying two swine production facilities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67(4): 1494-502.
[121] Bound JP, Voulvoulis N. Pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment-a comparison of risk assessment strategies. Chemosphere 2004; 56(11): 1143-55.
[122] Watkinson AJ, Murby EJ, Costanzo SD. Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: Implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res 2007; 41(18): 4164-76.
[123] Christian T, Schneider RJ, Färber HA, Skutlarek D, Meyer MT, Goldbach HE. Determination of antibiotic residues in manure, soil, and surface waters. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 2003; 31(1): 36-44.
[124] Lindsey ME, Meyer TM, Thurman EM. Analysis of trace levels of sulfonamide and tetracycline antimicrobials in groundwater and surface water using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2001; 73(19): 4640-6.
[125] Miao XS, Bishay F, Chen M, Metcalfe CD. Occurrence of antimicrobials in the final effluents of wastewater treatment plants in Canada. Environ Sci Technol 2004; 38(13): 3533-41.
[126] Deblonde T, Cossu-Leguille C, Hartemann P. Emerging pollutants in wastewater: A review of the literature. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2011; 214(6): 442-8.
[127] Regitano JB, Leal RMP. Comportamento e impacto ambiental de antibióticos usados na produção animal brasileira. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 2010; 34: 601-16.
[128] Martínez-Carballo E, González-Barreiro C, Scharf S, Gans O. Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 2007; 148(2): 570-9.
[129] Hirschmann JV. Antibiotics for common respiratory tract infections in adults. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162(3): 256-64.
[130] Khowawisetsut L, Sarasombath PT, Thammapalo S, et al. Therapeutic trial of doxycyclin plus ivermectin for the treatment of Brugia malayi naturally infected cats. Vet Parasitol 2017; 245: 42-7.
[131] Baneth G, Yasur-Landau D, Gilad M, Nachum-Biala Y. Canine leishmaniosis caused by Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica: Comparative findings and serology. Parasit Vectors 2017; 10(1): 113.
[132] Gaillard T, Madamet M, Pradines B. Tetracyclines in malaria. Malar J 2015; 14: 445.
[133] Edlind TD. Tetracyclines as antiparasitic agents: lipophilic derivatives are highly active against Giardia lamblia in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33(12): 2144-5.
[134] Masters DK, Hopkins AD. Therapeutic trial of four amoebicide regimes in rural Zaire. J Trop Med Hyg 1979; 82(5): 99-101.
[135] Katiyar SK, Edlind TD. Enhanced antiparasitic activity of lipophilic tetracyclines: role of uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35(11): 2198-202.
[136] Taylor MJ, Bandi C, Hoerauf A. Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv Parasitol 2005; 60: 245-84.
[137] Papich MG. Considerations for using minocycline vs doxycycline for treatment of canine heartworm disease. Parasit Vectors 2017; 10(Suppl. 2): 493.